Tamiflu

Jan. 9th, 2009 01:30 pm
tagryn: Owl icon (Default)
[personal profile] tagryn
If you get the flu this year, Tamiflu may not be a viable option: the NYT reports that while only 11% of the flu strains were resistant to it last year, this year 99% of them are. This reflects a trend of Tamiflu-resistant strains found in Europe last year, according to the article.

Date: 2009-01-09 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foomf.livejournal.com
I've always preferred vaccination as a flu preventative.
When Tamiflu was introduced, we were on Kaiser and they didn't allow it (being an extremely conservative HMO that would still be using blood-letting if their doctors didn't say no.)

I vaccinated regularly until my allergy to thimerosal became more exaggerated (last time: very large lump on arm at injection site, 103 fever within half hour, and rash over shot site).
Since then I was able to get a shot, once, using "child safe" low-thimerosal vaccine without a response, but that was off-label and only because they were past the point of distributing the shots.
But this year, I got the inhalant-form, attenuated-live-virus form.
So far, no active flu, unless the "gastrointestrinal excitement" plague going around has been a flu. Although my experience has been much less energetic than most others I know who got it.

Profile

tagryn: Owl icon (Default)
tagryn

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 07:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios